<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paparazi photos &#187; vintage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lumq.com/category/vintage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lumq.com</link>
	<description>Paparazzi, secret funny pictures, rare images, celebs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:47:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s the Next Hollywood Icon?</title>
		<link>http://lumq.com/08/next-hollywood-icon/</link>
		<comments>http://lumq.com/08/next-hollywood-icon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paparazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vintage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lumq.com/?p=605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take a look at some of today&#8217;s hottest stars channeling Old-Hollywood glamour!

Jennifer  Lopez  vs  Liz Taylor (1975)
No man can deny the smoldering sex appeal of Lopez, 38, and Taylor, 75, in their primes. Taylor has been hitched eight times (twice to Richard Burton), while Lopez is only on hubby number three.


Reese Witherspoon [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at some of today&#8217;s hottest stars channeling Old-Hollywood glamour!</p>
<p><a href="http://lumq.com/08/next-hollywood-iconnext-hollywood-icon"><img title="Jennifer  Lopez  vs  Liz Taylor" src="http://lumq.com/wp-content/gallery/actress/jen_liz.jpg" alt="Jennifer  Lopez  vs  Liz Taylor" width="566" height="566" /></a><br />
<strong>Jennifer  Lopez  vs  Liz Taylor</strong> (1975)<br />
No man can deny the smoldering sex appeal of Lopez, 38, and Taylor, 75, in their primes. Taylor has been hitched eight times (twice to Richard Burton), while Lopez is only on hubby number three.</p>
<p><span id="more-605"></span><br />
<a href="http://lumq.com/wp-content/gallery/actress/reese_grace.jpg"><img title="Reese Witherspoon  vs Grace Kelly" src="http://lumq.com/wp-content/gallery/actress/reese_grace.jpg" alt="Reese Witherspoon  vs Grace Kelly" /></a><br />
<strong>Reese Witherspoon  vs Grace Kelly</strong> (1964)<br />
Both won Oscars as wives of substance-abusing singers: Witherspoon, 31, as Johnny Cash&#8217;s flame in the 2005 biopic Walk the Line; Kelly as the spouse of a fictional singer (Bing Crosby) in 1954&#8217;s The Country Girl.</p>
<p><a href="http://lumq.com/wp-content/gallery/actress/michelle_mia.jpg"><img title="Michelle Williams  vs  Mia Farrow" src="http://lumq.com/wp-content/gallery/actress/michelle_mia.jpg" alt="Michelle Williams  vs  Mia Farrow" /></a><br />
<strong>Michelle Williams  vs  Mia Farrow</strong> (1968)<br />
The soft-spoken, gamine actresses sported similar short dos: Stylist Laini Reeves chopped Williams&#8217;, 27, locks in February, while Vidal Sassoon gave Farrow a $5,000 cut for her role in 1968&#8217;s Rosemary&#8217;s Baby.</p>
<p><a href="http://lumq.com/wp-content/gallery/actress/natalie_audrey.jpg"><img title="Natalie Portman  vs Audrey Hepburn " src="http://lumq.com/wp-content/gallery/actress/natalie_audrey.jpg" alt="Natalie Portman  vs Audrey Hepburn " /></a><br />
<strong>Natalie Portman  vs Audrey Hepburn</strong> (1961)<br />
Not only has Portman, 26, donned the dress Hepburn wore in 1961&#8217;s Breakfast at Tiffany&#8217;s, but both are humanitarians: Portman battles global poverty (FINCA), while Hepburn fought for children&#8217;s rights.</p>
<p><a href="http://lumq.com/wp-content/gallery/actress/scarjo_marilyn.jpg"><img title="Scarlett Johansson  vs  Marilyn Monroe" src="http://lumq.com/wp-content/gallery/actress/scarjo_marilyn.jpg" alt="Scarlett Johansson  vs  Marilyn Monroe" /></a><br />
<strong>Scarlett Johansson  vs  Marilyn Monroe</strong> (Mid 1950s)<br />
&#8220;Maybe it&#8217;s my platinum hair, or maybe it&#8217;s my body type,&#8221; Johansson, 22, has said of being compared to Monroe. &#8220;I never really understood it and don&#8217;t see it, but I absolutely love her.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>USMmagazine</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lumq.com/08/next-hollywood-icon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vintage fitness equipment</title>
		<link>http://lumq.com/07/vintage-fitness-equipment/</link>
		<comments>http://lumq.com/07/vintage-fitness-equipment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 07:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vintage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fitness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steampunk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vintage photo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lumq.com/07/vintage-fitness-equipment-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 




  
   
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<a href="http://lumq.com/07/vintage-fitness-equipment"  title="vintage sport equipment" ><img height="568" alt="vintage fitness equipment" src="http://lumq.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/vintage-fitness-devices-01-thumb.jpg" width="420" border="0" /></a> <br />
<a href="http://lumq.com/07/vintage-fitness-equipment/"  title="vintage sport equipment" ><img height="304" alt="vintage fitness equipment" src="http://lumq.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/vintage-fitness-devices-04-thumb.jpg" width="420" border="0" /></a>
</p>
<p><span id="more-604"></span></p>
<p>
  <a href="http://lumq.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/vintage-fitness-devices-02.jpg"><img height="526" alt="vintage fitness equipment" src="http://lumq.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/vintage-fitness-devices-02-thumb.jpg" width="400" border="0" /></a><br />
<a href="http://lumq.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/vintage-fitness-devices-03.jpg"   title="vintage sport equipment" ><img height="303" alt="old fitness equipment" src="http://lumq.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/vintage-fitness-devices-03-thumb.jpg" width="420" border="0" /></a><a href="http://lumq.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/vintage-fitness-devices-05.jpg"   title="vintage sport equipment" ><img height="298" alt="old fashioned equipment" src="http://lumq.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/vintage-fitness-devices-05-thumb.jpg" width="420" border="0" /></a> <a href="http://lumq.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/vintage-fitness-devices-06.jpg"   title="vintage sport equipment" ><img height="304" alt="vintage sport equipment" src="http://lumq.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/vintage-fitness-devices-06-thumb.jpg" width="420" border="0" /></a> <a href="http://lumq.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/vintage-fitness-devices-07.jpg"  title="vintage sport equipment" ><img height="333" alt="vintage photo sport  equipment" src="http://lumq.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/vintage-fitness-devices-07-thumb.jpg" width="420" border="0" /></a> <a href="http://lumq.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/vintage-fitness-devices-08.jpg"   title="vintage sport equipment" ><img height="304" alt="vintage fitness device" src="http://lumq.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/vintage-fitness-devices-08-thumb.jpg" width="420" border="0" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lumq.com/07/vintage-fitness-equipment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
